edvaldo b. guimarães filho

MVC, Razor, and Blazor in .NET: The Evolution of Web Development

MVC, Razor, and Blazor in .NET: The Evolution of Web Development

In the .NET ecosystem, MVC, Razor, and Blazor are powerful frameworks, each playing a crucial role in developing dynamic and responsive applications. Understanding their individual purposes, technical details, and evolution helps developers choose the right tools for their projects and explore the synergy between these technologies. In this article, we will explore the history, technical details, and applications of MVC, Razor, and Blazor, highlighting how they have shaped web development in .NET.

Timeline of MVC, Razor, and Blazor

  • 1979 – Model-View-Controller (MVC) design pattern was first conceptualized for desktop applications.
  • 2009 – ASP.NET MVC 1.0 launched, bringing MVC to .NET for structured web applications.
  • 2010 – ASP.NET MVC 2 and Razor syntax released, simplifying dynamic content rendering on the server.
  • 2016 – ASP.NET Core unifies MVC, Web API, and Razor Pages, improving performance and cross-platform support.
  • 2018 – Blazor preview released, introducing C#-based, client-side, interactive web application development.
  • 2020 – Blazor WebAssembly goes production-ready, enabling rich client-side applications.

Model-View-Controller (MVC) in .NET

ASP.NET MVC was one of Microsoft’s first major steps toward making .NET development more agile, modular, and testable. It separates application layers, promoting cleaner code organization and enabling more maintainable, scalable applications.

Key Components of MVC

  • Model: Represents the application’s data structure and business logic, including database operations and validation logic.
  • View: The presentation layer, where data from the Model is formatted and displayed to the user.
  • Controller: Handles user interactions, processes inputs, and updates the Model or View accordingly.

Importance of MVC in .NET

MVC brought web developers the flexibility to build web applications where the front-end and back-end components could evolve independently. This was especially valuable in enterprise applications, where separation of concerns, unit testing, and team collaboration were crucial.

Razor: Simplified Syntax for Dynamic Content

Razor was introduced as part of the MVC 2.0 framework in 2010, designed to streamline server-side rendering for dynamic HTML content. It allows developers to embed C# directly within HTML markup, significantly improving the readability and manageability of dynamic pages.

How Razor Works

Razor syntax uses a concise @ symbol to intersperse C# code within HTML, making it easier to handle loops, conditionals, and data binding directly in the view.

Razor Components and Pages

With ASP.NET Core, Razor became integral not only to MVC views but also to Razor Pages—a page-centric development model in ASP.NET Core. Razor Pages allow developers to create self-contained pages that include both the UI markup and logic in a single file, ideal for simple or small-scale applications.

Blazor: The Evolution to Rich Client-Side Web Apps

With the rise of Single Page Applications (SPAs) and client-side development, Blazor emerged as a framework that brings .NET development into the browser using WebAssembly. Blazor allows developers to build interactive web applications using C# and .NET, offering an alternative to JavaScript-based frameworks like Angular, React, and Vue.js.

Blazor Server vs. Blazor WebAssembly

  • Blazor Server: Renders UI updates on the server side and sends changes to the browser over SignalR. It offers fast load times but requires a constant server connection.
  • Blazor WebAssembly: Runs entirely in the browser via WebAssembly, providing a true SPA experience and enabling offline capabilities.

Benefits of Blazor in .NET Development

  • Full-stack development with C#: Developers can use the same language across the entire stack, reducing the complexity of switching between front-end and back-end languages.
  • Component-based architecture: Similar to React, Blazor promotes a component-based design, allowing reusability and modularity.
  • Seamless .NET ecosystem integration: Blazor integrates natively with .NET libraries, APIs, and tools, making it easier to work with database access, authentication, and other server-side functionalities.

MVC, Razor, and Blazor in Practice: Choosing the Right Framework

1. For Traditional Server-Rendered Applications:

  • MVC with Razor is ideal for applications where SEO, progressive enhancement, and immediate server-rendered pages are priorities.
  • Razor views render quickly on the server and allow easy data binding and validation, ideal for traditional, form-based web applications and enterprise dashboards.

2. For Page-Centric Applications:

  • Razor Pages simplify page-based development by combining logic and UI code, suited for small to medium applications or single-page, form-intensive applications.

3. For Rich, Interactive Web Applications:

  • Blazor WebAssembly is an ideal choice for SPAs requiring complex client-side interactions without heavy reliance on server processing.
  • Blazor Server works well for intranet applications or apps where a persistent server connection is feasible, like real-time dashboards or collaborative applications.

MVC, Razor, and Blazor Together: A Unified Approach

In ASP.NET Core, it’s common to use a blend of MVC, Razor Pages, and Blazor:

  • Blazor Components in MVC: MVC applications can integrate Blazor components for client-side interactivity, reducing reliance on JavaScript.
  • Razor Views in Blazor: Blazor Server apps can leverage Razor components when traditional page-centric rendering is beneficial, such as when building interactive forms.

The Future of .NET Web Development with MVC, Razor, and Blazor

With ongoing improvements to .NET, each framework continues to evolve:

  • Blazor will likely see greater performance enhancements, making WebAssembly a more viable option for heavy-duty applications.
  • MVC and Razor Pages will remain the backbone for applications prioritizing SEO and server-side rendering.

In the future, expect deeper integrations between these technologies, blurring the lines further and allowing for hybrid applications that leverage the best aspects of each framework.

In conclusion, MVC, Razor, and Blazor each bring unique strengths to .NET development. Whether building traditional server-rendered applications, page-centric apps, or rich, interactive SPAs, these frameworks offer flexible options for creating modern, responsive web applications with .NET. Choosing the right approach involves balancing your application’s requirements with the capabilities of each framework, and ASP.NET Core provides the flexibility to leverage each framework’s strengths where they’re most impactful.

Edvaldo Guimrães Filho Avatar

Published by

Edvaldo Guimrães Filho
With over 30 years of professional experience as a System and Business Analyst, Project Manager, and Technical Marketing and Sales Support Leader, including 20 years specializing in SharePoint and 5 years in Business AI Transformation, I have worked across various industries and markets. I have had the privilege of collaborating with top 500 Brazilian companies such as DASA, Siemens, Telefónica, Heineken, K2, Comgas/Raízen/Shell, Cognizant, Coty, Hypermarcas, Banco Itaú, Cobrape, Natura, Stefanini, Braskem, Nestlé, Avanade, TIM, Infoserver, SysMap, Vivo, Apsen, Siemens, EDS, Duracell, KPMG, Petrobras, CESP, TV Record, Método Engenharia, and MSD (Merck Sharp & Dohme). Today, I manage, project, and develop solutions and integrations using the following technological platforms: SharePoint, Microsoft 365, Power Platform, Power BI, C#, SQL, Python, JavaScript, React, IoT, C/C++, CAD, and 3D Printing.
Categories: , ,
Tags: , , ,